The MATTINO and the books on the Sud:una Victoria neoborbonica (Public) the MATTINO and the books on the South: one Victoria neoborbonica. Some observations on the publishing initiative of the Mattino (History from the South, in newspaper stand from 21 October). Some day it makes a publicity to all page brought back on the Mattino preannounced the escape weekly magazine of some relative banns to the history of the South. The first necessary consideration regards just the choice "trades them" of the argument and the "shapes" used "for pubblicizzarlo. 1) Without the "cultural provocazioni" of the Neoborbonico Movement and without the reconstruction of the historical memory and the southern pride put into effect in these 15 years with searches, conventions, books, seminaries, extensions, manifestations or by all means communicate-print and to our disposition (little, in truth, being never be politicamente corrected or do not line up to you), never would not be been born the initiative of the Mattino: they have understood that the thing could work from the point of view trades them and they have promoted it, strong of happened of similar publishing initiatives (the tens of reprints for books like those of Jaeger or Alianello, as an example) or of our same initiatives. 2) a coat of arms to colors on the Mattino, ritratto of Ferdinand II or the slogan: "knowing the past the present only can itself be comprised", is "ours" and represents, alone, one our Victoria cultural. Some other consideration, instead, is necessary as far as the choice of the titles them in issue. Manh?s, Mc Farlan and Mark Monnier on brigandage; general Church on the briganti "vanquishes to you" after 1848; Abel De Blasio with a test of criminalogy; the autobiography and the against-biography of Crocco; the end of the Reign of Raffaele De Cesar. To the inside of these books, then, some memory of Borjes, the relation of Commissione-Massari. The first observation regards the original dates of publication of these witnesses: from 1862 to the 1895 and choice he is not accidental: draft of authoritative in how much testimony of that age but unavoidablly partial sources however. A data on all: the books that face the topic of brigandage stop to the 1863 (relation of Massari deputy for the Commission on brigandage): no reference to the slaughters that, in great part, were come true and, in small part, was known, just from 1863. The same Massari, with its thesis ("southern poor for guilt of the Borbone-rebellion to the ingiustizie lay person-necessities of the repression") made to be born that ill-famed Pica law (August 1863) that gave the way to the harder slaughters to the damages of the southern people. When Manh?s, Mc Farlan, Monnier or Church write their books, as an example, they had not been still plunders and destroyed to countries like Pontelandolfo or Casalduni (August to you 1862). Which historical reliability can be attributed, then, to the Monnier that "dedicates" in the introduction its book to general Cialdini, one of most pitiless executory than those massacres? Or that it closes the same book with the phrase: "God wants it, Italy has its star and brigandage by now is ended". Draft, evidently, of authors in full "risorgimentale" age whom, even if they had intentional, they would not have in some which could way to speak about the phenomenon in objective way and exhausting. An example on all: still in 1898 (!), for a simple one "macchietta" that the Borbone remembered with nostalgia, the poet Russian Ferdinand was tried for "borbonismo" (all the papers of its study was seized and the letters of its poetry published just on the Mattino "were decomposed"). Great space comes given, then (3 tito them on 4 of that dedicates you to the argument), to the briganti pre-unitarians, leaving quite (Manh?s) from the cases already records to you in Aragonese age or, on purpose of the reliability of the sources already contested from some historian of the age, finding references in it gets worse novels of the old Dumas or in the proud relations of "sterminatori" the French officials of the cruel briganti calabrians after the invasion of 1806. Much space also to the briganti of 1799 and Ruffo cardinal, to the connivenze with reigning or even with the secret societies of the time. Enormous spaces also for the briganti of the rest of Italy (Kind Passator in head). A travel in the time and the space and also this is not accidental: p?rdono therefore of sight the real dimensions of problem-brigandage in southern Italy are in the space that in the time. In the introduction to the works, the curatore, Gianni Custodero, begin with references to Normanni (1100 approximately) and succeed in to cite also the cases put into effect them of Iraq, Palestine or Chapas, passing for the infantile sentimentalismo that ago risvegliare in we "Robin Hood or Sandokan". The effect intentional and, perhaps, obtained is the confusion: it is spoken tomorrow about the argument from the origins but, to the end, the motivations are not understood: "tritume of episodes and anecdotes we know like but not because and the main scope of the history is lacked" (using the words Benedict Cross reported just to the "End of the Reign" of De Cesar). A last observation on the book of Abel De Blasio: criminal anthropologist, was author of various banns lombrosiane (!) and between they "the skulls of the lucani" (Turin, 1895), "the ear of the normal and criminal Neapolitans" and same "the History of briganti" (the criminosit? was in the DNA of people of the South, like said its master, Lombroso, inventor, in practical, of that racism anti-meridional who still today resists). Possible that he could not himself be given space to the slaughters operates from the troops piemontesi-Italians to you and from those 120,000 soldiers send to you from Turin in order "to save" the "renaissance" (but in which other historical age from the Normanni in then there was need of many forces in field). Possible that he could not himself be thought next to the reprint if not of de' a Sivo or the numbers of Catholic Civilization, of a Butt? or a Michele Topa or the same Alianello? Possible that still he does not perceive himself for those our compatriots of a century and means it makes an exposed sense of respect after to have he beheads them to you and in the public squares (as he turns out only recently from documents of the Archives of General Staff of the Army and partially he catalogues to you)? A total analysis lacks the Reign (arduous to obtain it with the thousand anecdotes of the good De Cesar, friend, between the other, of several the ministers of the inside of the time). The colonization and the conquest of the South by now recognized also from not borbonici historians sure like the De lack the true causes brigandage (Rose, as an example). The consequences and the damages lack (hundred migliaia of dead men, million emigrating are left not to case endured after the end of brigandage). In conclusion, as it reports the same curatore to us of the initiative, "they have fallen much taboo and has made its time the history of the vincitori" but, if truly we love the South and we want indeed its I redeem, we cannot accept that the "closing" of this circle completes it in partial and superficial way the responsibles of the so-called official culture of which the Mattino it is sure an important example. They will say that we never do not please ourselves and is perfectly true: we speak about our earth and of our people and we will not never get tired ourselves to fight for the historical truth, without doubts and mistificazioni. If you are neoborbonici, then, you can be fairs of the job made in these years and that we will continue to make with between our books and our documents. If sapete still little of history of the South, instead, we leave also from these books but we read all what it can be read on these important arguments therefore puts into effect them and anchor today. You ask a council to us and ve we will give it, consulted our situated and our center-studies free of charge, we will accompany to you in turn for libraries and arches to you and we will reconstruct with that historical truth, our roots and a southern pride of which (seen the times and sights our ruling classes) we have need more and more. Gennaro De Crescenzo